Letter to Dianne Feinstein Requesting Explanation for Edward Snowden Treatment

from: ★ TheEditor <editor@thedailydigest.org>
to: ★ tc@feinstein.senate.gov
folder: editor@thedailydigest.org/Sent date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 12:11:56 -0700 user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 subject: Edward Snowden

To Whom it May Concern:

Because Ms. Feinstein does not publish her proper email address to enable her constituents to easily contact her, I have opted to send this email to T.C. Ostrander because of your connection with “government reform”.

I would appreciate an official response as to the reasoning why Ms. Feinstein has chosen to turn her back on the heroic Edward Snowden for simply uncovering criminal activity within our own government and providing that information to the people that paid for it – We the People.  The information that has come forth shines a bright light on activities within the government that are obviously and blatantly against the law.  I am not interested in Ms. Feinstein’s thoughts on why the people of this country should give up their rights, but only on why she refuses to uphold her oath and the laws of this nation.

I would also appreciate an official response as to why Ms. Feinstein has turned her back on the oath she took when taking office.  As a reminder, I will include it here:

I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.

As someone who has studied the Constitution and Bill of Rights, I find it appalling that a politician would swear to an oath “so help me God” and amorally turn against the very people that voted her into office.

If I do not receive a response forthwith, I will publish an article reflecting that Ms. Feinstein is evidently uninterested in what the voters think.
— 

Henry Wright – Staff Writer

Fax (855) 442-1522

http://www.thedailydigest.org

The information contained in this e-mail and/or attachment is information protected by attorney-client and/or the attorney work product privilege and is covered by the Electronics Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510-2521. This communication is intended ONLY for the recipient(s) identified in the message, and may contain information that is confidential, privileged, or otherwise protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately delete this communication, destroy any copies and notify the sender by responsive e-mail or by telephone at 855.442.1522.

SERVICE NOTICE:   The Daily Digest, or any person associated with this office, does not accept or consent to the service of process, motions, pleadings, documents, or any other items by electronic format. Correspondence via electronic format does not indicate agreement or consent to acceptance of service in that format.

Leave a Reply

8 Comments on "Letter to Dianne Feinstein Requesting Explanation for Edward Snowden Treatment"

Leave a Reply

Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
trackback

[…] away our rights.  This would be the only way of ridding ourselves of this cancerous growth, as she completely ignores the very people that are responsible for allowing her to serve us.  She is a criminal, and needs […]

trackback

[…] away our rights.  This would be the only way of ridding ourselves of this cancerous growth, as she completely ignores the very people that are responsible for allowing her to serve us.  She is a criminal, and needs […]

trackback

[…] away our rights.  This would be the only way of ridding ourselves of this cancerous growth, as shecompletely ignores the very people that are responsible for allowing her to serve us.  She is a criminal, and needs […]

trackback

[…] away our rights.  This would be the only way of ridding ourselves of this cancerous growth, as shecompletely ignores the very people that are responsible for allowing her to serve us.  She is a criminal, and needs […]

trackback

[…] away our rights.  This would be the only way of ridding ourselves of this cancerous growth, as she completely ignores the very people that are responsible for allowing her to serve us.  She is a criminal, and needs […]

trackback

[…] away our rights.  This would be the only way of ridding ourselves of this cancerous growth, as she completely ignores the very people that are responsible for allowing her to serve us.  She is a criminal, and needs […]

trackback

[…] away our rights.  This would be the only way of ridding ourselves of this cancerous growth, as she completely ignores the very people that are responsible for allowing her to serve us.  She is a criminal, and needs […]

trackback

[…] away our rights.  This would be the only way of ridding ourselves of this cancerous growth, as she completely ignores the very people that are responsible for allowing her to serve us.  She is a criminal, and needs […]

wpDiscuz